ok, or just simply add a statement somewhere like, dual stack hosts that can not send dns query over v6 are also out of scope. ;-)
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Lee, Yiu <[email protected]>wrote: > Ok. We did mention this in the draft, but it seems you found it unclear. > I will work with Alain to clarify the text. Thanks for the comments! > > > > On 5/30/10 3:57 AM, "Jacni Qin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > i agree with you that dns proxy over v6 in B4 should be preferred, > > while we should mention this special case in the draft, because this will > be not so special > if many hosts running that kind of OS still exist at the time when we start > to implement DS-Lite. > and the recommendations for dealing with this case may be also included. > > regards, > Jacni > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
