On 03.03.2011 09:00, [email protected] wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 
>       Title           : Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) 
> Option for Dual- Stack Lite
>       Author(s)       : D. Hankins, T. Mrugalski
>       Filename        : draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option-09.txt
>       Pages           : 8
>       Date            : 2011-03-02
> 
> This document specifies a DHCPv6 option which is meant to be used by
> a Dual-Stack Lite Basic Bridging Broadband (B4) element to discover
> the IPv6 address of its corresponding Address Family Transition
> Router (AFTR).
Dear wg,

There's updated version of DS-Lite tunnel option for DHCPv6 available.
Summary of changes in -09:

- changed MUST NOT to SHOULD NOT in Section 3 (regarding sending
  DS-Lite option in messages other than Solicit, Advertise, Request,
  Renew, Rebind, Information-Request and Reply), as suggested by Ted
  Lemon.
- better readability in validation description (an attempt to improve
  writing style rather than the information itself)
- fixed mistake in reference to DS-Lite-06 (HA is described in Section
  12.3, not 7.2)

According to my knowledge, this revision addresses all outstanding
issues and comments. Please do let me know if I'm mistaken.

-- 
Tomek
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to