Hi, There was a debate between ip literal v.s. fqdn for this issue. Please search the old mail archive to check it out. If I recall correctly, a major argument would be, many ISPs prefer dns server to do load balancing over dhcp server.
Thanks, washam 2011/6/30 <[email protected]>: > Hi All, > > One question about the new DHCPv6 option for AFTR discovery. Maybe I missed > the previous discussion. Sorry for that. > According to draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option, a FQDN is suggested > to be deliveried in the new DHCPv6 option to the B4. When receiving the FQDN, > B4 has to do the DNS resolution to get the AFTR IPv6 address. The FQDN of the > AFTR has to be configured in the DNS server. So, I think delivering the IPv6 > address of the AFTR directly to the B4 is better. We can use DHCPv6 option to > do this. The address of the AFTR only needs to be configured in the DHCPv6 > server. > > Best Regards, > Zhenqiang Li > 2011-06-30 > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
