Hi Yiu,all,
I see the first use case worth good value to work on, as the reason I
stated during meeting: operators would happy with it because otherwise
(the second case), means moving AFTR lower location, which ends up with
more CAPEX.
Xiaohong
________________________________
From: Lee, Yiu [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Softwires] DS-lite Multicast
Hi WG,
In today meeting, we presented two drafts on to enable multicast
in DS-lite. I think they target different use cases:
The use case of
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-qin-softwire-dslite-multicast-04 is to
deliver multicast over DS-lite in an IPv6 multicast enabled network.
The use case of
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarikaya-softwire-dslitemulticast-00 is
to deliver multicast over DS-lite in an IPv6 multicast disabled network.
I think both drafts target different use cases. My question to
the WG is: Should we work on both use cases? If not, which use case the
WG should work on first?
I really want to hear people comments. Please raise your voice
in the ML.
Thanks,
/Yiu
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
