hi Behcet, 2012/4/10 Tina TSOU <tina.tsou.zout...@huawei.com>
> > > Sent from my iPad > > On Apr 10, 2012, at 10:12 AM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <sarikaya2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Maoke, > > > > Thank you for your efforts in technical details of one specific > > proposal on the table. > > > > However, I for one think that probably it is time to concentrate on > > commonalities rather than the differences. As Alain indicated, these > > proposals do have a lot of common points. > > > that proposal is basically of a response to people's call for "describing technical concerns in mind" about 4rd-U. commonality and difference is the two sides of the same coin. if we don't understand what makes them exactly different, we are also hard to understand how common they are. this document is purposed in sharing such an understanding and therefore it focuses only on the essential concerns -- the concerns regarding architecture and protocol semantics. > > Why don't (whoever) write a draft putting together all the common > > points concentrating on CE to BR and abstracting out BIH, XLAT, etc.? > > Such a draft can be of great value at this point, I think. > That's MAP-D document. > > > yes. as Tina points out, MAP deployment draft that we are working on plays the role of clarifying the common deployment considerations with MAP series. thanks! best, maoke > > Regards, > > > > Behcet > > > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
