WG,
He have published a new draft describing how an lw4o6 CPE can use PCP
for provisioning.
We're looking for high-level feedback on questions such as:
- Is using PCP a good idea or is it fatally flawed?
- Would this WG consider an alternative to DHCP?
- What would be the relationship with the unified CPE draft?
Thanks,
Simon
-------- Message original --------
Sujet: New Version Notification for
draft-perreault-softwire-lw4over6-pcp-00.txt
Date : Tue, 04 Jun 2013 01:54:06 -0700
De : internet-dra...@ietf.org
Pour : Chongfeng Xie <xie...@ctbri.com.cn>, Cathy Zhou
<cathy.z...@huawei.com>, Simon Perreault <simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca>
A new version of I-D, draft-perreault-softwire-lw4over6-pcp-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Chongfeng Xie and posted to the
IETF repository.
Filename: draft-perreault-softwire-lw4over6-pcp
Revision: 00
Title: Provisioning Lightweight 4over6 (lw4o6) with the Port Control
Protocol (PCP)
Creation date: 2013-06-03
Group: Individual Submission
Number of pages: 6
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-perreault-softwire-lw4over6-pcp-00.txt
Status:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perreault-softwire-lw4over6-pcp
Htmlized:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-perreault-softwire-lw4over6-pcp-00
Abstract:
This memo defines the procedures that a Lightweight B4 uses for
provisioning its parameters with the Port Control Protocol.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
