Hi, Tom Thank you for your comments. As the draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib-00.txt replaces the draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib-11 for new NAT-MIB-V2, so some objects in DS-Lite MIB which had been imported from draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib-11 will be updated according to the new NAT-MIB-V2.
Thanks Yu -----Original Message----- From: Softwires [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Taylor Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 10:10 PM To: Tina TSOU; Sheng Jiang Cc: [email protected]; Yong Cui; Spencer Dawkins Subject: Re: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07 Actually, you're a little behind on the NATV2-MIB document. draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib-11 has been replaced by the two documents draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-00.txt and draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib-00.txt I submitted the latter a couple of days ago. The deprecate draft will see a minor update shortly, and there is a bit more work to be done on the natv2 draft. We would love to have comments on that one. In any event, I see an action on myself to look over the Softwire MIB documents. Tom Taylor On 22/01/2015 1:57 AM, Tina TSOU wrote: > Dear Sheng et al, > > Below are the NAT MIB drafts status. > > draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib-11<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib/> > Definitions of Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT) > 2014-01-24 Expert Review::Revised I-D Needed (for 175 days) > WG Document Spencer Dawkins > > draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-00<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1/> > Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address > Translators (NAT)) 2014-10-19 AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed > (for 5 days) > IETF Spencer Dawkins > > > > Thank you, > Tina > > On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Sheng Jiang > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > This draft did pass the last WGLC. The later modification came from MIB > doctor review and the modification of depending document NAT-MIB. This second > last WGLC is necessary giving these new modifications. I support the > modifications and moving the document forward. > > Best regards, > > Sheng > > -----Original Message----- > From: Softwires [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yong > Cui > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:05 PM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: Cui 崔勇 > Subject: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07 > > Hi folks, > > This message starts a two week softwire working group last call on > advancing the draft of DS-Lite MIB as a Standards Track RFC. > > After we had the first wglc on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-02, > there were some major comments. The authors have revised the document > including the structure and detailed technical contents. > Now the authors believe that this version has addressed all the > issues. > > The latest version of the draft is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07.txt > > Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for > advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. > Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last > call will conclude on February 3, 2015. > > > Thanks, > > Yong & Suresh > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
