Yong and Michael, thanks for your assistance, I just approved this errata. Regards
-éric On 13/10/2022, 03:30, "YONG CUI" <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks for the report. I agree with Eric. If we would make it more clear, we can use the following sentence then: "Translating an IPv4 packet to carry it across the MAP domain will increase its size (typically either 20 or 28 bytes with fragmentation).” Cheers, -Yong > 2022年10月12日 22:45，Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta) <[email protected]> 写道： > > That makes sense to me. > > Michael Overcash > Principal Architect, Premises Technology > C 678.637.5649 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 9:47 AM > To: RFC Errata System <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Wojciech Dec (wdec) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta) <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7599 (7160) > > Thank you, Michael, for your report. > > I would though slightly modify your corrected text into: > > "Translating an IPv4 packet to carry it across the MAP domain will increase its size (typically either 20 or 28 bytes)." > > -éric > > On 12/10/2022, 15:44, "RFC Errata System" <[email protected]> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7599, > "Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7160__;!!Hit2Ag!353LGaZsbdumiTzQWGG_70wKyv1Hodu5NDb_n4crAFfT6WnsJh88tNTr5iUohBgG5jkenJKWnv2toSS0ffE$ > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Michael Overcash <[email protected]> > > Section: 10.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > Translating an IPv4 packet to carry it across the MAP domain will increase its size (typically by 20 bytes). > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Translating an IPv4 packet to carry it across the MAP domain will increase its size (typically by 28 bytes). > > Notes > ----- > In the context of MTU, it is important to account for packet fragmentation. If an IPv4 packet is fragmented, the size will increase by 28 bytes during translation. The IPv6 header is 20 bytes larger than the IPv4 header, and in addition the 8 byte IPv6 Fragmentation Header must be added. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7599 (draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-08) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T) > Publication Date : July 2015 > Author(s) : X. Li, C. Bao, W. Dec, Ed., O. Troan, S. Matsushima, T. Murakami > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Softwires > Area : Internet > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
