I agree that we should put the version info in the name of the jar files. It makes it a lot easier to tell what version are being used.
Bill On 1/26/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did that because my IDE projects refer to exact filenames, and it > makes it more painful when they keep changing. > > I'm OK with changing them in the interest of being more standard though. > > -Yonik > > On 1/26/06, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > > Solr needs a servlet-api.jar to compile against. > > > I had grabbed the one (servlet v2.4) from Tomcat 5.5, is this the > > > right approach? Any reason not to use this version? > > > > It is a good practice to provide version information with jar files. So > > this might better be named servlet-api-2.4.jar, or perhaps > > tomcat-5.5-servelet-api.jar. > > > > Similarly, xpp3.jar should have a version number in its name too. > > > > Doug > > >
