[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-73?page=comments#action_12454159 ] Walter Underwood commented on SOLR-73: --------------------------------------
I think the aliases are harder to read. You need to go elsewhere to figure them out. I read documentation, but I didn't find the part of the wiki that explained them and I had to ask the mailing list. The javadoc uses the full class name. Google and Yahoo searches should work better with the full class name (Yahoo is working much better than Google for that right now). The aliases save typing, but I don't think they improve usability. Full class names are simple and unambiguous. If we want usability for non-programmers, we can't have them editing an XML file. > schema.xml and solrconfig.xml use CNET-internal class names > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-73 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-73 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Components: search > Reporter: Walter Underwood > > The configuration files in the example directory still use the old > CNET-internal class names, like solr.LRUCache instead of > org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache. This is confusing to new users and should > be fixed before the first release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
