Ahh, here's the pointer: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
''' If A Distribution Contains Code Under Several Licenses, Should It Contain Several License Files? No - all license information should be contained in the LICENSE file. When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE file should contain details of all these licenses. For each component which is not Apache licensed, details of the component and the license under which the component is distributed should be appended to the LICENSE file. ''' -Yonik On 12/1/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/1/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought this was exactly what the NOTICE file is for? Mention all > the code from other projects we use, including ASL code. LICENSE is > just for our own (Solr) stuff. LICENSE needs to apply to everything in the distribution. Solr's current LICENSE has ASL 2.0, followed by the license for the XML parser we use, as directed by legal-discuss. -Yonik