On Jan 22, 2007, at 6:14 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:

Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
as i said, i'd rather invert the use case set to find where "ordering
isn't important" and change those to Maps

That might be a *lot* of changes...
What's currently broken, just faceting or anything else?

Faceting is the only thing I've come upon. After playing with this more and contemplating all the messages on this thread, I can't say that it's "broken", but telling solr to sort things and then when pulling them back out on the other end in seemingly random order it sure feels that way. Re-sorting on the client is the easiest solution and I've gone that route for now.

I plan on digging into the JSON option a bit and seeing if order is preserved, though I doubt it would be any difference since it will surely parse back into a Hash by default. Though the json.nl.arr=arr would surely preserve order, though that changes the access to things all over the place on the client.

Having the facet_counts area output as an ordered list in all cases seems the most sensible to me, since it is unlikely that the facets would be accessed by key. But, again, resorting on the client is sufficient for me for now.

        Erik

Reply via email to