On 2/5/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/4/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hymmm. what do you think the best option is?
>
> Should we increase the time it waits to check if stuff autocommited?
> It currently waits 1 second for something that *should* start an
> autocommit within 1/2 sec.
Perhaps we should increase the alloted time _and_ check explicitly if
an egregious amount of time has passed in the unittest. If so, we can
skip the test instead of failing it.
That's probably a good idea.
I was able to get the current version to fail on my PC at work
intermittently by running something else that was eating CPU.
-Yonik
