On 2/12/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: * A newer version of Lucene's JAR: to have *:* syntax.
+0 ... i don't really have any opinion about reving Lucene as far as the
nbightly builds go ... I think yonik menitoned before that it would be
good to make sure Solr 1.2 used a stable version of Lucene,
Specifically, that Solr 1.2 should use Lucene 2.1 (or later).
There were so many index format changes in Lucene lately, I wanted
some assurances about back-compatibility in the future.
but i don't
think it would be bad if nightly builds of Solr (which are by definition
supose to be considered developer builds and therefore unstable) used
unstable Lucene builds.
Right.
For Solr official releases, we should prefer offlcial Lucene releases,
but I wouldn't want to make it a "rule".
So I'm fine with updating to the latest Lucene nightly build now... It
would give us a chance to make sure it works well for us too. Lucene
2.1 shouldn't be too far off... but I'm sick yet again, and it's hard
enough writing email in this state that I'm not going to go near any
code :-)
-Yonik
