[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492369 ]
J.J. Larrea commented on SOLR-217: ---------------------------------- +1 to Hoss' elaboration of Yonik's suggested approach, except for reverse-compatibility (where we DO want an error for unknown fields) schema.xml should probably read something like: <!-- since fields of this type are by default not stored or indexed, any data added to them will be ignored outright --> <fieldtype name="ignored" stored="false" indexed="false" class="solr.StrField" /> ... <!-- uncomment the following to ignore any fields that don't already match an existing field name or dynamic field, rather than reporting them as an error. alternately, change the type="ignored" to some other type e.g. "text" if you want unknown fields indexed and/or stored by default --> <!--dynamicField name="*" type="ignored" /--> > schema option to ignore unused fields > ------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-217 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-217 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: update > Affects Versions: 1.2 > Reporter: Will Johnson > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.2 > > Attachments: ignoreNonIndexedNonStoredField.patch, > ignoreUnnamedFields.patch > > > One thing that causes problems for me (and i assume others) is that Solr is > schema-strict in that unknown fields cause solr to throw exceptions and there > is no way to relax this constraint. this can cause all sorts of serious > problems if you have automated feeding applications that do things like > SELECT * FROM table1 or where you want to add other fields to the document > for processing purposes before sending them to solr but don't want to deal > with 'cleanup' -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.