[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497179
]
Brian Whitman commented on SOLR-242:
------------------------------------
OK, I guess I am over-complicating by trying to simplify. XSLT to me seems like
something that happens at the very end of everything, and the response writers
seem to be a different "class" of things.
But if tr is only used by xslt, shouldn't it be xslt.tr (to follow the
standard, like json.nl?)
Also, if wt=xslt is set but no tr=, what happens?
> tr parameter implies XSL, no wt=xslt necessary
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-242
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Brian Whitman
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Perhaps the most trivial issue ever, but &tr=file.xsl should imply that the
> XML from whichever response writer is being used gets parsed by the given
> transform. The wt=xslt is somewhat redundant. And maybe change the tr
> parameter to xslt.
> Imagine in the future there's a response writer that outputs a different kind
> of XML. That shouldn't preclude the use of a transform on top of that
> response.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
