On 5/25/07 10:45 AM, "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> : I'd slap versions to those 2 XSL files to immediately answer "which
> : version of Atom|RSS does this produce?"
> 
> i'm comfortable calling the example_rss.xsl "RSS", since most RSS
> readers will know what do do with it, but i don't know that i'm
> comfrotable calling it any specific version of RSS, people are more likely
> to get irrate about claiming ot be a specific version if one little thing
> is wrong then they are about not claiming to be anything in particular.

Some versions of RSS are quite incompatible, so we MUST say what
version we are implementing. RSS 1.0 is completely different from
the 0.9 series and 2.0.

Atom doesn't have a version number, but RFC 4287 Atom is informally
called 1.0. 

wunder

Reply via email to