: > In the case of the unit tests and though, it seems like a : > simplification of the tests to make them not dependent on external : > configuration that is provided via Ant or any other tool.... : : Yes, I agree. : : Any objections to committing the setProperty part?
i'm still not sure what we're talking about exactly (am i the only one not getting the attachments?) but i'm okay with changing tests to make them run more universally ... i was just leary of some mentioned changes to Config.java (not that i know what they were mind you .. jus that it seemed odd to need to change the actual code to get the tests to run in an IDE). -Hoss
