On 6/29/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so we should test that use case (ie: <add> containing 10000 small
> documents;
For processing a single request with 10000 documents, the existing XPP
update handler is faster then the new StaxUpdateHandler.
XPP: 6888 6714
STAX: 8665 8313
Have you tried Woodstox to see how it compares?
If you do more testing, in addition to Hoss' recommendations, I'd also
remove the unused elements (copyFields, dynamicFields) from the schema
(as well as testing w/o logging).
-Yonik
