On 7/11/07, Henrib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're absolutely right. I went too fast.
We can access the http request parameters from the servlet filter though, so
this "quick fix" might be possible.
Henri

I'm not sure if that would handle params as part of a multi-part
upload (which uses a 3rd party lib since it's not supported by servlet
containers AFAIK).

-Yonik


Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On 7/11/07, Henrib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Passing the core name as an Http request parameter to use an existing
>> core
>> is easy.
>> In the patched SolrServlet, replacing the first few lines of doGet with
>> the
>> code that follows should do the trick.
>
> Not quite that easy, given that we are using a filter now
> (SolrDispatchFilter),
> which uses SolrRequestParsers to get the parameters (which currently
> requires the core), and can do other things such as handle a binary
> post body in addition to parsing params from the URL.  It looks like
> some of that code should be refactored so that the core is not needed,
> and then the core parameter could be retrieved from the resulting
> SolrParams.
>
> IMO SolrServlet, being the older (original) implementation need not
> support multiple cores.
>
> -Yonik
>
>

--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--jira--Commented%3A-%28SOLR-2-1-5%29-Multiple-Solr-Cores-tf4063316.html#a11548596
Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Reply via email to