[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-139: ------------------------------- Attachment: SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch Updated to use Yonik's 'getStoredFields'. The one change to that is to have UpdateHandler addFields() load fields as the Object (not external string) and to skip copy fields: void addFields(Document luceneDoc, SolrDocument solrDoc) { for (Fieldable f : (List<Fieldable>)luceneDoc.getFields()) { SchemaField sf = schema.getField( f.name() ); if( !schema.isCopyFieldTarget( sf ) ) { Object externalVal = sf.getType().toObject(f); solrDoc.addField(f.name(), externalVal); } } } - - - - This still implements modifiable documents as a RequestProcessor. > Support updateable/modifiable documents > --------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: update > Reporter: Ryan McKinley > Assignee: Ryan McKinley > Attachments: getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, > getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, > SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, > SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, > SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, > SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, > SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, > SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, > SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, > SOLR-139-XmlUpdater.patch, > SOLR-269+139-ModifiableDocumentUpdateProcessor.patch > > > It would be nice to be able to update some fields on a document without > having to insert the entire document. > Given the way lucene is structured, (for now) one can only modify stored > fields. > While we are at it, we can support incrementing an existing value - I think > this only makes sense for numbers. > for background, see: > http://www.nabble.com/loading-many-documents-by-ID-tf3145666.html#a8722293 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.