I was considering adding quite a few pages for the solrsharp project.  Any
specific requests for where new content should go?

-- j

On 9/5/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> i've been thinking that there are some little things that could be done to
> clean the wiki up a bit, i'm happy to do them but i wanted to send out a
> quick ping before i spend a chunk of time on it in case someone thinks
> it's a bad idea...
>
> 1) find all usages of stuff like [Solr 1.2+], [Solr1.2], [Solr 1.3] that
> denote when a feature/param was added and change them to...
>
>     <!>["Solr1.2"]            (or 1.3 as needed)
>
> ...the <!> will insert an "attention" icon to help people notice them,
> and the quotes will force MoinMoin to make a link out of hte text (Solr1.2
> isn't a very MoinMoin friendly wiki word)
>
> 2) gut the contents of the Solr1.2 (it still has a bunch of pre 1.2
> release planning) and replace it with a page explaining when 1.2 was
> released, where to find it, and a blurb explaining that any links to this
> page are used to indicate a feature that was added in this release.
>
> 3) add a Solr1.3 page with a similar blurb about how it denotes a feature
> that *should* be added in 1.3)
>
> (making these pages and using links instead of just text will make it
> eaier down the road to find them and remove them ... when we're up to Solr
> 2.0 we don't really need to draw attention to features added in 1.2)
>
> 4) create MoinMoin "Categories" for things like RequestHandlers and
> ResponseWriters (the MoinMoin editing screen gies you a pulldown to assign
> pages to categories when editing them) .. put all of the RequestHandler
> and
> ResponseWriter pages in the appropriate category, and change various
> places (ie: FrontPage) to use the macro for listing all pages in a
> category so we don't have to maintain the list manually.
>
>
> objections?
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>

Reply via email to