[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12562314#action_12562314
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-457:
------------------------------------
these changes look good to me..
If we change SolrRequest to an abstract super class, there is probably no good
reason to also have RequestBase.
While we are at it, should SolrResponse change to an abstract class? I can't
think of any reason it would need to be an interface. (I think we should keep
SolrResponseBase as is)
> A multi threaded implementation for solrJ
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-457
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: clients - java
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: patrick o'leary
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: multithreaded-solrj.patch, solrj.patch
>
>
> Provide a multi threaded implementation of CommonsHttpSolrServer
> For usage with distributed searching in solr-303
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
