Ah, yes, RDRH is another good one that makes sense as contrib/ Do we need a JIRA issue for contrib creation? I haven't looked at your contrib in detail nor RDRH, but if we'll need a common build system a la build*.xml in Lucene's contrib/ then we can open a JIRA issue, as somebody will have to put that together.
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2008 6:27:32 AM > Subject: Re: contrib for solr > > There is another class of patches like this RichDocumentRequestHandler > (SOLR-284) which brings in dependencies on other libraries, which can > safely live as a contrib project. > > Do we need to raise a jira issue to track this (contrib creation)? > > --Noble > > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Otis Gospodnetic > wrote: > > Hi Contributor ;) > > > > I think this is a good suggestion. I think Lucene's contrib/ is working > > OK, > so I think it's safe to follow that approach. If we observe that something > in > contrib/ is *so* frequently used or very core in some way, we can svn mv it > and > carry on. > > > > Otis > > > > -- > > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Saturday, May 3, 2008 5:30:30 PM > > > Subject: contrib for solr > > > > > > Hi Committers, > > > > > > As Solr matures and the codebase grows, putting everything in the core > > > will lead to a bloat. This may impact our ability to have releases > > > early and often. > > > > > > A case in point is DataImportHandler (SOLR-469). As per our discussion > > > with Grant Ingersoll, it makes a lot of sense to make this a contrib > > > project rather than adding it to the core codebase. Though it adds a > > > lot of value to the system, it actually makes no modifications to the > > > core and works purely as a component that can be plugged in by > > > configuration. > > > > > > Going forward, this may not be an exception (as in case of Lucene) and > > > we will have more components like this. > > > > > > So we propose that we have a contrib area for Solr and add > > > DataImportHandler to that (and any other component which may fit the > > > bill). > > > > > > please comment > > > -- > > > --Noble Paul > > > -- Shalin Shekhar Mangar > > > > > > > > > >
