[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12595964#action_12595964
 ] 

Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-485:
---------------------------------------

Shalin - great!  I *think* at this point it makes sense to (re)write the SCRH 
as a Search Component, so perhaps it's okay to take the deprecation route Grant 
proposed if the changes you are making look like they could break things for 
consumers of current SCRH.

Oh, do you know when, roughly, you will have this ready?  Not trying to be 
pushy, but plan to see if/when I should make my SC changes.  I'd rather wait 
for you a little instead of doing similar work in parallel.


> Deprecate SpellCheckRequestHandler replace with one that does query analysis 
> and spell checks each token
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-485
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-485
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.2
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.3
>
>
> The current spellchecker does not handle multiword queries very well, if at 
> all.  Depending on the settings, it either ignores multiword tokens, or it 
> splits on whitespace.  It should use the query analyzer associated with the 
> spelling field to produce tokens for spelling.
> We should deprecate the current one and replace it with one that is similar, 
> but does the appropriate thing with the query tokens.
> Seehttp://www.mail-archive.com/solr-dev@lucene.apache.org/msg07542.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to