[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597481#action_12597481
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-572:
--------------------------------------
{quote}
I don't understand what you mean by "defer to others" but on making this
default or not, I'm fine either way.
{quote}
Just meaning, I'm not the only one who has a say in whether or not is a default
component. My guess is not everyone will want it in the default list of
components.
Very cool on the other stuff.
One other thing to think about: What if we want a different underlying spell
checker? The Lucene spell checker approach isn't exactly state of the art as
far as I understand it. Obviously not your concern at the moment, but might be
good to think about the ability to interchange the underlying implementation by
abstracting the notion of spelling a bit while still maintaining the same
search component interface.
> Spell Checker as a Search Component
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-572
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: spellchecker
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Fix For: 1.3
>
> Attachments: SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch
>
>
> Expose the Lucene contrib SpellChecker as a Search Component. Provide the
> following features:
> * Allow creating a spell index on a given field and make it possible to have
> multiple spell indices -- one for each field
> * Give suggestions on a per-field basis
> * Given a multi-word query, give only one consistent suggestion
> * Process the query with the same analyzer specified for the source field and
> process each token separately
> * Allow the user to specify minimum length for a token (optional)
> Consistency criteria for a multi-word query can consist of the following:
> * Preserve the correct words in the original query as it is
> * Never give duplicate words in a suggestion
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
