There are working patches available on the issue without the "advanced features" and everyone is free to fix the current one. It's not like it is that far off from being able to have proper spellchecking, pluggability, and context information about where the mistakes are. I frankly don't get what all the fuss is about.

Is it that you disagree with the approach? That hasn't come across in the discussions, but if it is, say so. I thought we were working on it quite well together and made some good progress and are pretty darn close. I don't see that I've taken away any functionality that the original patch offers, but I did change it so that it fits a broader audience, namely those who are interested in other spell checkers and those who want info about where in the query the problem occurs. Which, is what the comments suggest people are interested in and also what I am interested in for 1.3.

And, I'm sorry, but I said I'd have to let it lie for a few days and then I would be back to it. Cut me some slack. I don't get paid to work on Solr full time. Is it truly that important that someone can't wait a few days for a patch on the trunk version for something they never had before? It ain't like we're talking some core bug here that has everyone broken. Besides, others are perfectly welcome to work on it in the meantime.

Sorry for the rant, but I am not going to be pressured into committing a patch that I don't think is ready and one that I said I am going to be working on to see it through so that we all are happy.

-Grant

On Jun 4, 2008, at 1:14 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् wrote:

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will be back on it tomorrow and will see this through before 1.3 with the abstractions. In other words, -1 on cutting this off prematurely. :-) Since I don't think this is the only thing holding up 1.3, let's just play
it out and get it right so all of us are happy.

This feature may not be holding back 1.3 release. The potential users
of this issue are very much interested in a basic working version.
They may be able to live without these advanced features. May be we
can have another jira issue for enhancements which may/may not go into
1.3 (depending on when it happens).




-Grant

On Jun 3, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:

The current patch has been broken for some days now and implementing a correct query parsing logic may take time to get right. Let's not aim for
everything to get into the 1.3 release.

I would like to cut down the scope of this issue to a implementation that
indexes files and Lucene indices (both Solr and arbitary) and gives
suggestions while using the correct analyzer for multi-word queries. Let's
get a spell checker working and commit it. We can deal with more
enhancements like abstractions for custom spellcheckers and query parsing
etc. in another issue which can be dealt with separately (in 1.3 or
after).
Thoughts? If there is a general consensus, I can give a new patch which
can
be good enough to go in.

On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Oleg Gnatovskiy (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
wrote:


[

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601256 #action_12601256]

Oleg Gnatovskiy commented on SOLR-572:
--------------------------------------

I installed the latest patch. Still getting a NPE. Here is my config:

<searchComponent name="spellcheck"
class="org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponent">
<lst name="defaults">
  <!-- omp = Only More Popular -->
  <str name="spellcheck.onlyMorePopular">false</str>
  <!-- exr = Extended Results -->
  <str name="spellcheck.extendedResults">false</str>
  <!--  The number of suggestions to return -->
  <str name="spellcheck.count">1</str>
</lst>

 <lst name="spellchecker">
  <str
name="classname">org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellChecker</ str>
  <str name="name">external</str>
   <str name="sourceLocation">spellings.txt</str>
   <str name="characterEncoding">UTF-8</str>
   <str name="fieldType">text_ws</str>
  <str

name="indexDir">/usr/local/apache/lucene/solr2home/solr/data/ spellIndex</str>
</lst>
</searchComponent>


Here is the URL I am hitting:

http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=pizza&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.dictionary=external&spellcheck.build=true

Here is the error:

HTTP Status 500 - null java.lang.NullPointerException at
org.apache.lucene.index.Term.<init>(Term.java:39) at
org.apache.lucene.index.Term.<init>(Term.java:36) at

org .apache .lucene .search.spell.SpellChecker.suggestSimilar(SpellChecker.java:228)
at

org .apache .solr .spelling .AbstractLuceneSpellChecker .getSuggestions(AbstractLuceneSpellChecker.java:71)
at

org .apache .solr .handler .component.SpellCheckComponent.process(SpellCheckComponent.java: 177)
at

org .apache .solr .handler .component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:153)
at

org .apache .solr .handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java: 125)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:965) at

org .apache .solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java: 339)
at

org .apache .solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java: 274)
at

org .apache .catalina .core .ApplicationFilterChain .internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
at

org .apache .catalina .core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java: 206)
at

org .apache .catalina .core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
at

org .apache .catalina .core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:175)
at

org .apache .catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128)
at

org .apache .catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
at

org .apache .catalina .core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
at

org .apache .catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:286)
at

org .apache .coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:844)
at

org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol $Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:583)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint $Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:447)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)

spelling.txt is in my solr/home/conf.

Spell Checker as a Search Component
-----------------------------------

             Key: SOLR-572
             URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572
         Project: Solr
      Issue Type: New Feature
      Components: spellchecker
Affects Versions: 1.3
        Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
        Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
        Priority: Minor
         Fix For: 1.3

     Attachments: SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch,

SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch,
SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch,
SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch


Expose the Lucene contrib SpellChecker as a Search Component. Provide
the

following features:

* Allow creating a spell index on a given field and make it possible to

have multiple spell indices -- one for each field

* Give suggestions on a per-field basis
* Given a multi-word query, give only one consistent suggestion
* Process the query with the same analyzer specified for the source
field

and process each token separately

* Allow the user to specify minimum length for a token (optional)
Consistency criteria for a multi-word query can consist of the
following:
* Preserve the correct words in the original query as it is
* Never give duplicate words in a suggestion

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Reply via email to