[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12616399#action_12616399
 ] 

noble.paul edited comment on SOLR-139 at 7/24/08 2:14 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------

How about maintaining a separate index at store.index and write all the 
documents to that index also. 

In the store.index , all the fields must be stored and none will be indexed. 
This index will not have any copy fields . It will blindly dump the data as it 
is.

Updating can be done by reading data from this.  Deletion must also be done on 
both the indices

This way the original index will be small and the users do not have to make all 
fields stored

      was (Author: noble.paul):
    How about maintaining a separate index at store.index and write all the 
documents to that index also. 

In the store.index , all the fields must be stored and none will be indexed. 
Updating can be done by reading data from this. 

This way the original index will be small and the users do not have to make all 
fields stored
  
> Support updateable/modifiable documents
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-139
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: update
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>            Assignee: Ryan McKinley
>         Attachments: Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, 
> Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, 
> Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, 
> Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, 
> getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, 
> SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, 
> SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, 
> SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, 
> SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, 
> SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, 
> SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, 
> SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, 
> SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, SOLR-139-XmlUpdater.patch, 
> SOLR-269+139-ModifiableDocumentUpdateProcessor.patch
>
>
> It would be nice to be able to update some fields on a document without 
> having to insert the entire document.
> Given the way lucene is structured, (for now) one can only modify stored 
> fields.
> While we are at it, we can support incrementing an existing value - I think 
> this only makes sense for numbers.
> for background, see:
> http://www.nabble.com/loading-many-documents-by-ID-tf3145666.html#a8722293

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to