+1 for 1.3 RC.
The idea of putting new issues in 1.3.1 has been tossed around a few
times on this list in the last few weeks. I'm not sure how other
people feel about this, but in my mind, 1.X.Y and 1.X.Z releases
should be feature-identical, with later releases only containing
bugfixes. If we have a bunch of cool features we want to release
shortly, I'd be happy with releasing 1.4 quickly :)
-Mike
On 25-Aug-08, at 7:30 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
+1 for Lucene upgrade
+1 for a release candidate.
I think the newer issues can make it to 1.3.1 easily. We don't need
to halt
1.3 for them.
A general question -- how long does a Release Candidate phase lasts?
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for Lucene upgrade
+1 for a release (I *think* none of the recent SOLR-7** issues have
to go
in 1.3)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
----- Original Message ----
From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:06:46 AM
Subject: Re: 1.3 status
On Aug 25, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Given that there are backward compat concerns with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142
perhaps we should update Lucene again before a release?
+1
Erik
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
