[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12651678#action_12651678
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-885:
------------------------------------
bq. But , before javabin we used to use xml which has same Semantics for
namedList and SimpleOrderedMap it is right?
You are talking about solrj, correct? Yes - by default we used a syntax that
keeps order. But that does not mean the difference between the classes is not
useful for other cases
Ideally the javabin implementation would know if the result was originally
SimpleOrderedMap or not. This would only really be important in the case where
you use javabin to pass on a result to a client (distributed?)
> Generify NamedListCodec
> -----------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-885
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-885
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-885.patch
>
>
> * make NamedListCodec a generic class which may be able to write any of the
> supported object
> * Deprecate NamedList and use only SimpleOrderedMap. (Yes it is backward
> compatible)
> * Ideally I wish to call this JavabinCodec because it should be able to be
> used to write any kind of supported objects
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
