[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kay Kay updated SOLR-915:
-------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-915.patch
1. New class- SolrExecutor, providing an abstraction of the Executor framework
for all threads across the SolrSystem.
2. SolrCore:
. List<closeHooks> changed to Collection<CloseHook> as the order does not
matter when they are launched in independent threads.
3. More comments added to CloseHook explaining the context of the same.
> SolrCore;close() - scope to exploit parallelism among the number of
> closeHooks
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-915
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-915
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Environment: Tomcat 6, JRE 6
> Reporter: Kay Kay
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-915.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 96h
> Remaining Estimate: 96h
>
> In SolrCore: close() - all the way towards the end of the function - there
> seems to be a sequential list of close method invocation.
> if( closeHooks != null ) {
> for( CloseHook hook : closeHooks ) {
> hook.close( this );
> }
> }
> I believe this has scope to be parallelized ( actually the entire sequence of
> close operations , updateHandler,close() etc.) - by means of launching them
> in separate threads from an ExecutorService , for a much faster shutdown as
> the process definitely does not need to be sequential.
> This becomes all the more important in the multi-core context when we might
> want to shutdown and restart a SolrCore altogether.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.