+1
I think we could try just comment out the kitchen sick portions and avoid maintaining 2 config files. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinman...@gmail.com> > To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com > Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 1:20:50 AM > Subject: Re: faster example schema > > +1 > > perhaps schema.xml and schema-example.xml? > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > > I've occasionally run across people going with another search engine > > because it was faster at indexing. > > The example schema that people may be using as a base to do their > > benchmarking (with perhaps minimal modifications) is slow. > > There are many people out there that check what's fastest first, and > > *then* check if it is satisfactory to meet their needs in other areas. > > > > With very simple synthetic test documents (just a few fields each) and > > the CSV loader, I've personally seen the indexing rate go from > > ~330/sec to ~3000/sec, when I removed the default field values, term > > vectors, copyFields, etc. The default example schema should still be > > able to show how something can be done, but that doesn't mean it needs > > to be enabled by default. > > > > So what do people think about speeding up the default/example schema before > > 1.4? > > > > -Yonik > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
