[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12707723#action_12707723
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-877:
--------------------------------------
bq. Unless I'm missing something, it doesn't make sense to exclude the lower
bound... seems like it would often be useful to know if what the user typed in
matched a term in the index.... excluding it would lead one to believe that it
doesn't exist.
I think excluding the lower bound allows you to get the _next_ item for
suggestion, but I suppose it is up to the app to decide whether they want to
confirm the existing word, or just suggest what could come next.
> Access to Lucene's TermEnum capabilities
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-877
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-877
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Yonik Seeley
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-877.patch, SOLR-877.patch, SOLR-877.patch,
> SOLR-877_2.patch
>
>
> I wrote a simple SearchComponent on the plane the other day that gives access
> to Lucene's TermEnum capabilities. I think this will be useful for doing
> auto-suggest and other term based operations. My first draft is not
> distributed, but it probably should be made to do so eventually.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
