[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12711075#action_12711075
]
Uri Boness commented on SOLR-1123:
----------------------------------
Indeed this is just for convenience and should not be in a high priority, but I
definitely see it as a nice to have one. Just to clarify, the suggestion is not
to have another request parameter (that would probably be too much as you
mentioned) but instead add a configuration parameter in solrconfig. So you'll
be able to define the json response writer as follows:
{code:xml}
<queryResponseWriter name="json"
class="org.apache.solr.request.JSONResponseWriter">
<bool name="useJsonContentType">true</bool>
</queryResponseWriter>
{code}
> Change the JSONResponseWriter content type
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1123
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1123
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Uri Boness
> Fix For: 1.5
>
> Attachments: JSON_contentType_incl_tests.patch
>
>
> Currently the jSON content type is not used. Instead the palin/text content
> type is used. The reason for this as I understand is to enable viewing the
> json response as as text in the browser. While this is valid argument, I do
> believe that there should at least be an option to configure this writer to
> use the JSON content type. According to
> [RFC4627|http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt] the json content type needs to
> be application/json (and not text/x-json). The reason this can be very
> helpful is that today you have plugins for browsers (e.g.
> [JSONView|http://brh.numbera.com/software/jsonview]) that can render any page
> with application/json content type in a user friendly manner (just like xml
> is supported).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
