[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730152#action_12730152
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1216:
-----------------------------------
Also, internally, everything is still SnapPuller, SpanShot for classnames and
variable names and what not.
I think we have to go whole hog if we want to change to fetchindex - otherwise,
its still confusing anyway.
We could also stick with snappull and snapshot, but I think we would need to be
more clear about that means - in terms of Lucene, in terms of the old scripts,
and in terms of the ReplicationHandler.
> disambiguate the replication command names
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1216
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1216
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: replication (java)
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1216.patch, SOLR-1216.patch, SOLR-1216.patch
>
>
> There is a lot of confusion in the naming of various commands such as
> snappull, snapshot etc. This is a vestige of the script based replication we
> currently have. The commands can be renamed to make more sense
> * 'snappull' to be renamed to 'sync'
> * 'snapshot' to be renamed to 'backup'
> thoughts?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
