On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Chris Hostetter<hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: > > : > Or, may be just multiple facet.prefix values, Yonik; exactly the same as > : > facet.field works. > : > : The problem then becomes labels. > : facet.field=foo goes under the label "foo" > : > : We already have a mechanism to re-label results, seems like we should use > that? > > i think Avlesh is just suggesting that... > > facet.field=foo & f.foo.facet.prefix=a & f.foo.facet.prefix=z > > ...should result in a single facet.field result section for "foo" with the > values that start with "a" and the values that start with "b" > > it seems like in an ideal world, both syntaxes would work -- the one above > to make a single section, and the one below to have two seperate > sections...
Ah, yeah... in this case the client would be able to determine which was which by the prefix of the label. But it brings up interesting points about ordering... should all of prefix "A" come before prefix "B" or should they be sorted by frequency. If it's the latter case, then it seems like it's more the case of wanting an additional filter applied to the facet, which we should also support at some point. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
