Gabriel, The most efficient way to improve highlighting is to perform it on a dedicated server? That way it's not impacting the speed of production query execution?
-J On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Gabriel Farrell (JIRA)<j...@apache.org> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750080#action_12750080 > ] > > Gabriel Farrell commented on SOLR-1268: > --------------------------------------- > > Voting for this issue because of the following great message from Bess Sadler: > > One of the feature requests we get pretty often with Blacklight is > search term highlighting. The main reason we don't have it yet is > because it's a performance drag. We have attempted to add it a couple > of times, but it kills performance so much for large collections or > large text fields that we had to remove it again. > > I just had an interesting chat with Erik Hatcher, and he pointed me at > this: > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a4deefd915f706d4/highlighting_performance > > It seems Lucene 2.9 has a faster highlighting solution available now, > FastVectorHighlighter. However, it hasn't yet worked its way into > solr. If you are one of the people who would like to see search term > highlighting (or, maybe just faster search term highlighting) in > blacklight, vufind, Fac-Back-OPAC, helios, or any of the many other > library apps that use solr, you might want to go vote for the jira > issue at: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > > >> Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter >> ------------------------------------------ >> >> Key: SOLR-1268 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 >> Project: Solr >> Issue Type: New Feature >> Components: highlighter >> Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi >> Priority: Minor >> > > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >
