This is by design so that any non-official build isn't seen as "1.4.0"
anywhere.
Erik
On Nov 10, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Jeff Newburn <jnewb...@zappos.com> wrote:
So which would be appropriate? My concern is that the 1.4.1 has a
larger
file size so don't want to miss some 1.4 feature or bug fix that
happened
between 11/6 and 11/10.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
From: Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@googlemail.com>
Reply-To: <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:14:44 +0100
To: <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Solr 1.4.0 vs 1.4.1
Afaik, there was a discussion about this recently (can't remember
where). Lucene and its sub projects used to set the version number in
build.xml to the release number but this has been changed to the
current dev version.
simon
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Jeff Newburn
<jnewb...@zappos.com> wrote:
The distribution seems to have precompiled 1.4.0 files from Nov
6th but when
the project is build with ant dist it kicks out jars/wars with
1.4.1-dev.
Is this what we are expecting since there is no mention in the
CHANGES.txt
file.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
