Yes it should look similar to that. What is the exact request you send to Solr? Also to check if the patch works correctly can you run: ant clean test There are a number of tests that test the Field collapse functionality.
Martijn 2009/12/7 Marc Sturlese <marc.sturl...@gmail.com>: > >><lst name="collapse_counts"> >> <str name="field">cat</str> >> <lst name="results"> >> <lst name="009"> >> <str name="fieldValue">hard</str> >> <int name="collapseCount">1</int> >> <result name="collapsedDocs" numFound="1" start="0"> >> <doc> >> <long name="id">008</long> >> <str name="content">aaa aaa</str> >> <str name="col">ccc</str> >> </doc> >> </result> >> </lst> >> ... >> </lst> >></lst> > I see, looks like I am applying the patch wrongly somehow. > This the complete collapse_counts response I am getting: > <lst name="collapse_counts"> > <str name="field">col</str> > <lst name="results"> > <lst> > <int name="collapseCount">1</int> > <int name="collapseCount">1</int> > <int name="collapseCount">1</int> > <str name="fieldValue">bbb</str> > <str name="fieldValue">ccc</str> > <str name="fieldValue">xxx</str> > <result name="collapsedDocs" numFound="1" start="0"> > <doc> > <long name="id">2</long> > <str name="content">aaa aaa</str> > <str name="col">bbb</str> > </doc> > </result> > <result name="collapsedDocs" numFound="1" start="0"> > <doc> > <long name="id">8</long> > <str name="content">aaa aaa aaa sd</str> > <str name="col">ccc</str> > </doc> > </result> > <result name="collapsedDocs" numFound="4" start="0"> > <doc> > <long name="id">12</long> > <str name="content">aaa aaa aaa v</str> > <str name="col">xxx</str> > </doc> > </result> > </lst> > </lst> > </lst> > > As you can see I am getting a <lst> tag with no name. As I understood what > you told me. I should be getting as many lst tags as collapsed groups and > the name attribute of the lst should be the unique field value. So, if the > patch was applyed correcly teh response should look like: > > <lst name="collapse_counts"> > <str name="field">col</str> > <lst name="results"> > <lst name="354> (the head value of the collapsed group) > <int name="collapseCount">1</int> > <str name="fieldValue">bbb</str> > <result name="collapsedDocs" numFound="1" start="0"> > <doc> > <long name="id">2</long> > <str name="content">aaa aaa</str> > <str name="col">bbb</str> > </doc> > </result> > </lst> > <lst name="654"> > <int name="collapseCount">1</int> > <str name="fieldValue">ccc</str> > <result name="collapsedDocs" numFound="1" start="0"> > <doc> > <long name="id">8</long> > <str name="content">aaa aaa aaa sd</str> > <str name="col">ccc</str> > </doc> > </result> > </lst> > <lst name="654"> > <int name="collapseCount">1</int> > <str name="fieldValue">xxx</str> > <result name="collapsedDocs" numFound="4" start="0"> > <doc> > <long name="id">12</long> > <str name="content">aaa aaa aaa v</str> > <str name="col">xxx</str> > </doc> > </result> > </lst> > </lst> > </lst> > > Is this the way the response looks like when you use teh patch? > Thanks in advance > > > Martijn v Groningen wrote: >> >> Hi Marc, >> >> I'm not sure if I follow you completely, but the example you gave is >> not complete. I'm missing a few tags in your example. Lets assume the >> following response that the latest patches produce. >> >> <lst name="collapse_counts"> >> <str name="field">cat</str> >> <lst name="results"> >> <lst name="009"> >> <str name="fieldValue">hard</str> >> <int name="collapseCount">1</int> >> <result name="collapsedDocs" numFound="1" start="0"> >> <doc> >> <long name="id">008</long> >> <str name="content">aaa aaa</str> >> <str name="col">ccc</str> >> </doc> >> </result> >> </lst> >> ... >> </lst> >> </lst> >> >> The result list contains collapse groups. The name of the child >> elements are the collapse head ids. Everything that falls under the >> collapse head belongs to that collapse group and thus adding document >> head id to the field value is unnecessary. In the above example >> document with id 009 is the document head of document with id 008. >> Document with id 009 should be displayed in the search result. >> >> From what you have said, it seems that you properly configured the patch. >> >> Martijn >> >> 2009/12/7 Marc Sturlese <marc.sturl...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Hey there, I have beeb testing the last patch and I think or I am missing >>> something or the way to show the collapsed documents when adjacent >>> collapse >>> can be sometimes confusing: >>> I am using the patch replacing queryComponent for collapseComponent (not >>> using both at same time): >>> <searchComponent name="query" >>> class="org.apache.solr.handler.component.CollapseComponent"> >>> What I have noticed is, imagin you get these results in the search: >>> doc1: >>> id:001 >>> collapseField:ccc >>> doc2: >>> id:002 >>> collapseField:aaa >>> doc3: >>> id:003 >>> collapseField:ccc >>> doc4: >>> id:004 >>> collapseField:bbb >>> >>> And in the collapse_counts you get: >>> <int name="collapseCount">1</int> >>> <str name="fieldValue">ccc</str> >>> <result name="collapsedDocs" numFound="1" start="0"> >>> <doc> >>> <long name="id">008</long> >>> <str name="content">aaa aaa</str> >>> <str name="col">ccc</str> >>> </doc> >>> </result> >>> >>> Now, how can I know the head document of doc 008? Both 001 and 003 could >>> be... wouldn't make sense to connect in someway the uniqueField with the >>> collapsed documents? >>> >>> Adding something to collapse_counts like: >>> <int name="collapseCount">1</int> >>> <str name="fieldValue">ccc</str> >>> <str name="uniqueFieldId">003</str> >>> >>> I currently have hacked FieldValueCountCollapseCollectorFactory to >>> return: >>> <str name="fieldValue">ccc#003</str> >>> but this respose looks dirty... >>> >>> As I said maybe I am missunderstanding something and this can be knwon in >>> someway. In that case can someone tell me how? >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> JIRA j...@apache.org wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> [ >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12783484#action_12783484 >>>> ] >>>> >>>> Martijn van Groningen edited comment on SOLR-236 at 11/29/09 9:56 PM: >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> I have attached a new patch that has the following changes: >>>> # Added caching for the field collapse functionality. Check the [solr >>>> wiki|http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing] for how to configure >>>> field-collapsing with caching. >>>> # Removed the collapse.max parameter (collapse.threshold must be used >>>> instead). It was deprecated for a long time. >>>> >>>> was (Author: martijn): >>>> I have attached a new patch that has the following changes: >>>> # Added caching for the field collapse functionality. Check the [solr >>>> wiki|http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing] for how to configure >>>> the >>>> field-collapsing with caching. >>>> # Removed the collapse.max parameter (collapse.threshold must be used >>>> instead). It was deprecated for a long time. >>>> >>>>> Field collapsing >>>>> ---------------- >>>>> >>>>> Key: SOLR-236 >>>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 >>>>> Project: Solr >>>>> Issue Type: New Feature >>>>> Components: search >>>>> Affects Versions: 1.3 >>>>> Reporter: Emmanuel Keller >>>>> Fix For: 1.5 >>>>> >>>>> Attachments: collapsing-patch-to-1.3.0-dieter.patch, >>>>> collapsing-patch-to-1.3.0-ivan.patch, >>>>> collapsing-patch-to-1.3.0-ivan_2.patch, >>>>> collapsing-patch-to-1.3.0-ivan_3.patch, field-collapse-3.patch, >>>>> field-collapse-4-with-solrj.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, >>>>> field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, >>>>> field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, >>>>> field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, >>>>> field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, >>>>> field-collapse-solr-236-2.patch, field-collapse-solr-236.patch, >>>>> field-collapsing-extended-592129.patch, field_collapsing_1.1.0.patch, >>>>> field_collapsing_1.3.patch, field_collapsing_dsteigerwald.diff, >>>>> field_collapsing_dsteigerwald.diff, field_collapsing_dsteigerwald.diff, >>>>> quasidistributed.additional.patch, SOLR-236-FieldCollapsing.patch, >>>>> SOLR-236-FieldCollapsing.patch, SOLR-236-FieldCollapsing.patch, >>>>> solr-236.patch, SOLR-236_collapsing.patch, SOLR-236_collapsing.patch >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This patch include a new feature called "Field collapsing". >>>>> "Used in order to collapse a group of results with similar value for a >>>>> given field to a single entry in the result set. Site collapsing is a >>>>> special case of this, where all results for a given web site is >>>>> collapsed >>>>> into one or two entries in the result set, typically with an associated >>>>> "more documents from this site" link. See also Duplicate detection." >>>>> http://www.fastsearch.com/glossary.aspx?m=48&amid=299 >>>>> The implementation add 3 new query parameters (SolrParams): >>>>> "collapse.field" to choose the field used to group results >>>>> "collapse.type" normal (default value) or adjacent >>>>> "collapse.max" to select how many continuous results are allowed before >>>>> collapsing >>>>> TODO (in progress): >>>>> - More documentation (on source code) >>>>> - Test cases >>>>> Two patches: >>>>> - "field_collapsing.patch" for current development version >>>>> - "field_collapsing_1.1.0.patch" for Solr-1.1.0 >>>>> P.S.: Feedback and misspelling correction are welcome ;-) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >>>> - >>>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://old.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28SOLR-236%29-Field-collapsing-tp10440315p26674651.html >>> Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Met vriendelijke groet, >> >> Martijn van Groningen >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28SOLR-236%29-Field-collapsing-tp10440315p26678606.html > Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Met vriendelijke groet, Martijn van Groningen
