[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789884#action_12789884
]
Uri Boness commented on SOLR-1649:
----------------------------------
I think the class hierarchy needs to change. see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1123?focusedCommentId=12711133&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12711133
> Refactor all ResponseWriters to be more extension-friendly
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1649
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1649
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Response Writers
> Affects Versions: 1.4
> Environment: My local MacBook pro over the Christmas break.
> Reporter: Chris A. Mattmann
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> I'd like to refactor all the ResponseWriters to be a bit less brittle.
> ResponseWriters should follow a standard interface with more existing methods
> than is currently present in the interface, and with lots of refactored
> utility code and more concrete control/data flow. I'll take a hard look at
> the existing response writers and try to generalize.
> See this thread for background:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/e8bb6cac84c1f520/namespaces_in_response_solr_1586#cc50ba9e9d8fe2dc
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
