On Dec 24, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> Any objection to moving the suffix/subfield stuff up to CoordinateFieldType? >> I'm working on the Cartesian Tier stuff and it has much the same pattern >> for this stuff. > > I dunno... will it complicate things more? What's the difference > between CoordinateFieldType and PointFieldtype?
I envision you could have things like a ShapeFieldType that inherits from CoordinateFieldType (i.e. has a subtype and a dimension) > What will the base class be for asking for a bounding box? > Actually, what I think I need is the subType/suffix handling separate from the dimension stuff. I'll put up a patch in a few days. Time to go eat some Christmas cookies. -Grant
