I have not taken a look at the patch (could not apply it) . But I am in agreement with the idea of moving responsewriters to a new package. Just that the changes should be backward compatible
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Here's what you're voting on: >> >> [ x] Yes, move forward with SOLR-1602 with the plan proposed above >> [ ] No, don't move forward with SOLR-1602 because... >> >> I'll leave the vote open for 72 hours. Votes from SOLR committers are >> binding, but everyone is welcome to voice your opinion. > > Not to throw cold water on the formality... but.. when I suggested we get > broader approval, i was not thinking about jumping into a formal vote... > > Seems odd to put a three day window while many people are on vacation :) > > ryan > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul | Systems Architect| AOL | http://aol.com
