[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795883#action_12795883
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on SOLR-1602:
-----------------------------------------
Hi Noble,
I'm not sure anything has been blown out of proportions -- this is a discussion
related to an issue and a great example of the open source world and
communication. As far as my opinion differing, I'm fine with accepting it
differs from yours, Erik's and Hoss's, but that it doesn't seem to from Ryan's.
In terms of copying files between releases, how much more arduous would it be
to do a copy _and_ execute a upgrade_solr_cofig 1 line bash script I could
attach to this issue to upgrade the SOLR config file?
Cheers,
Chris
> Refactor SOLR package structure to include o.a.solr.response and move
> QueryResponseWriters in there
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1602
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1602
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Response Writers
> Affects Versions: 1.2, 1.3, 1.4
> Environment: independent of environment (code structure)
> Reporter: Chris A. Mattmann
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Fix For: 1.5
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1602.Mattmann.112509.patch.txt,
> SOLR-1602.Mattmann.112509_02.patch.txt
>
>
> Currently all o.a.solr.request.QueryResponseWriter implementations are
> curiously located in the o.a.solr.request package. Not only is this package
> getting big (30+ classes), a lot of them are misplaced. There should be a
> first-class o.a.solr.response package, and the response related classes
> should be given a home there. Patch forthcoming.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
