[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796586#action_12796586
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-1699:
----------------------------------
Hi,
I like the idea of standardising the syntax in the solrconfig.xml, but I think
this is actually not categorising the UpdateHandler correctly. It gives the
impression that it can respond to requests, and is just an alternative to the
other update request handlers (XmlUpdateRequestHandlers & co), which it isn't.
> deprecate the updateHandler configuration syntax
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1699
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1699
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> For all practical purposes, an updatehandler is a requestHandler. We can do
> away with a custom syntax for updatehandler
> example
> {code:xml}
> <requestHandler class="solr.DirectUpdateHandler2">
>
> <lst name="autoCommit">
> <int name="maxDocs">10000</int>
> <int name="maxTime">3600000</int>
> </lst>
>
> <!-- represents a lower bound on the frequency that commits may
> occur (in seconds). NOTE: not yet implemented
>
> <int name="commitIntervalLowerBound">0</int>
> -->
> </requestHandler>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
