Yonik Seeley wrote: > The current way of allowing the omission of a core name in the URL is > to name the core DEFAULT_CORE. > While this functionality is great, and allows a multi-core setup to be > back compat with existing URLs, if someone does want to also refer to > the core by it's proper name, it looks pretty ugly. This also impacts > SolrCloud, since the core name is used as the collection name by > default (and a collection name of DEFAULT_CORE is... ugly). > > So I'd propose that we either: > 1) allow an optional flag in solr.xml to mark that any core is also > the default core > 2) rename DEFAULT_CORE to something nicer like "collection1" > > It seems like #1 would be preferable... thoughts? > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > I think we should do both - allow marking any core as the default and change our single core example solr.xml to use collection1 rather than DEFAULT_CORE.
-- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com
