On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Ryan McKinley <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm confused... what is the need for a new name? The only place where > > there is a conflict is in the top level svn tree... > > Agree, no need to re-brand. I don't see any need to rebrand. The artifacts will still be called Lucene and Solr, regardless. In SVN, the natural thing to do is go with the momentum that puts solr under lucene. Insofar as the TLP, I would think that it would still be Lucene with two delivered artifacts.
