Hi Hoss. I've tried that yesterday using the same approach you just said (I've created the base fields for any language with basic analyzers) and it worked alright.
Thanks again for you time. Regards, Daniel On 20/6/07 21:00, "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : So far it sounds good for my needs, now I'm going to try if my other > : features still work (I'm worried about highlighting as I'm going to return a > : different field)... > > i'm not really a highlighting guy so i'm not sure ... but if you're okay > with *simple* highlighting you can probably just highlight your title > field (using a whitespace analyzer or something) and get decent results > without needing to worry about the fact that you are using differnet > langauges. > > > > -Hoss > http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.
