: home we have named. However, there's still the last part of my question : that feels suspicious why the "solr" string is directly coded in the script : (unlike other cases they usually use ${solr_root} to get to specific dirs. : ) I pasted this line again below:
sorry ... i didn't realize you were talking about the script, i thought you were talking aboutthe docs. : I saw in snappuller line 226 (solr 1.2): : : ${stats} rsync://${master_host}:${rsyncd_port}/solr/${name}/ : ${data_dir}/${name}-wip : : Is the above "solr" a hard-coded solr home name? If so, it's not desirable I'm not 100% positive, but I believe that is just an arbitrary "virtual" path relative the "root" of the rsyncd server ... it could be anything, as long as snappuller and the rsyncd agree on what it is, so it's hardcoded to be "solr". If we used ${solr_root} then the slaves and the master would have to use teh exact same solr home directory. -Hoss