It is a POST so it's not a jetty limit.

The mysterious "4096" numbers in the string that begins _header=[6518349,32231686,m=4,g=4096,p=4096,c=4096] ... and "java.io.IOException: FULL" in the server traceback made me think that the size of a static buffer is being exceeded. Since the exception is I/O could it be an I/O buffer limitation?

The fq values represent the document ids in a collection. Is there a workaround to allow longer fq lists? I guess one way is to limit collection size but this is not desirable for application reasons.

Phil

Yonik Seeley wrote:
1000 filters, wow!

Perhaps you hit a jetty limit on the size of a GET request or
something?  Perhaps try POST?

-Yonik

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Phillip Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use a filter query (fq) parameter in my requests to limit the select
response to a subset of all document ids.  I'm getting a Solr exception when
the number of values in the fq approaches 1000.   I get the following
response from Solr:


_header=[6518349,32231686,m=4,g=4096,p=4096,c=4096]={/solr/select?q=ship&fl=id,score&fq=id:(883108+1355308+
 ... <<several 100's of ids>> ... +851832976+8536687}{}

_buffer=[6518349,32231686,m=4,g=4096,p=4096,c=4096]={/solr/select?q=ship&fl=id,score&fq=id:(883108+1355308+
 ... <<several 100's of ids>> ... +851832976+8536687}{}
 2008-04-03 10:42:54.005::WARN:  handle failed
 java.io.IOException: FULL
        at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:274)
        at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:202)
        at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:378)
        at
org.mortbay.jetty.bio.SocketConnector$Connection.run(SocketConnector.java:226)
        at
org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThreadPool.java:442)


 The id field is currently a string.  Would it help to make it a long int?
Is there some internal limit on the number of values in a fq or is there a
configuration parameter that will allow me to increase this number?

 Thanks,

 Phil

Reply via email to