I am just wondering, because having 200 fields seems like too much (for me), I want to know if people actually have such kind of schemas and how well they perform.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you actually seeing performance problems or just wondering if there > will be a performance problem? > > -Grant > > > On Apr 24, 2008, at 7:08 AM, Umar Shah wrote: > > Hi, >> >> I wanted to know what would be the performance of SOLR for the following >> scenario: >> the documents contain say 200 fields with >> say 100 of the fields (containing numbers) >> and rest containing short strings of 40-50 character length. >> the sparseness of the data can be assumed to be as approximately 50 fields >> missing per document. >> >> any insights? >> >> can a default value of 0 for missing fields change the performance, how? >> >> thanks in anticipation, >> -umar >> > > -------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > > Lucene Helpful Hints: > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ > > > > > > >
